“我可真能把你活嚼了！”马丁说，回报的眼光也不客气，他打量着对手那病怄诉的身子。

"I could certainly eat you alive," Martin said, in turn running insolent eyes over the other's disease-ravaged frame.

除了“布朗诉教育委员会案”，他批评了最高法院几乎所有扩展了民权范围的主要判决。

He had criticized almost every major Supreme Court decision expanding civil rights except Brown v. Board of Education.

高级法院还裁定了布朗诉教育委员会反抗学校的种族隔离，但学校和各州都“置之不理且不受责罚，”奥巴马这样回忆道。

The high court had also ruled in Brown v. Board of Education against school segregation but schools and states had "ignored it with impunity, " Obama recalled.

Last time, we argued about the case of Queen versus Dudley and Stevens, the lifeboat case, the case of cannibalism at sea.

上节课，我们讨论了,女王诉达德利和斯蒂芬斯案，即救生艇的案例，海上食人惨案。

Portnoy's Complaint", it's about a young Jewish guy growing up from the 70s.

波特诺伊的怨诉》讲的是一个生长在七十年代的年轻犹太小伙子。

With this basic principle of utility on hand, let's begin to test it and to examine it by turning to another case, another story, but this time, not a hypothetical story, a real life story, the case of the Queen versus Dudley and Stevens.

有了这条最基本的功利原则，让我们检验一下这条原则,是否适用于另一案例，而这一次，就不再是假定的事件了，是个真实的故事，女王诉达德利和斯蒂芬斯案。